Informal conduits act in the mid of
the conflict
“Non-state actors in the mantle of
Israeli-Palestinian conflict”
Wherever in this globe conflicts take a colorful shape, not
as we think used to be in their familiar image shows that they all about a
battlefield where conflicting sides fighting one another irrespective of what
shape does it take this confrontation. This is a cursory glance at the
conflicts.
However, conflicts formulate a periphery where miscellaneous actors
existent at many spheres acting in the confrontational circles, each of which
has own goals and agenda why working in conflict zones or what sort of products
these actors are playing on.
Therefore, conflict is an unparalleled realm to other
realms that enjoy pacifism which is in our perspective of international
relations aren’t considerably a fertile environment call up different actors to
come in and act inside in order for putting down
hostilities through educational tools might be jointly between the conflicting
sides.
Taking a look at the Israeli-Palestinian scene, we can figure
out different kind of conflict has been going on for decades passing through
impassable paths in most often causing fluctuations at political and social
arena. It’s thinkable that this situation shattered apart the standards of
dignified life and ended up seeking a firm intervention by multiple parties
to patch up what have been deteriorated for long years due to the fragility of
the ground that presumably is a robust where both sides should have already
built up sustainable understandings.
The nature of violent confrontation between Palestinians and
Israelis has shaped a status quo imposes intervention on the respective
actors abroad to plunge into this ramified confrontational circle for repairing
what have been torn apart, even in an attempt to restore the irreparable parts.
Therefore, the International Community especially the countries that are close
allies to both Israel-Palestine sides in certain policies conceive this
conflict from another angle believing that compromising the conflict through
formal diplomatic and political conduits isn’t always the feasible solution, but disregarding the local level where contiguously both sides are living without absolute reconcilable relationships. These countries realize that
the local civil society ought to be targeted as well in a step pleasing kind of
equilibrium at both sides in line with bottom-up approach of resolving
conflicts.
Undoubtedly, the tangible consequences of this endless
confrontation sharpen the attention of the civil society organizations or (NGOs) that act
in many fields to provide the required remedies for rebuilding the
conflict-ridden communities specifically at the Palestinian side.
Delving profoundly into this non-governmental sector, whether
already founded NGOs which receive funding from abroad to enhance their
activities or foreign NGOs act at both sides, we can touch upon the ongoing
activities organized to recruit individuals at their different ages
that aim at strengthening certain values through educational tools to fill the vacuums, and drawing out the nuggets that have made the target groups
dysfunctional because of the conflict which these civil society organizations
dedicated to work on, believing that it’s a way for conflict mitigation
especially the ones that take a common ground model at both sides.
As the agenda of these NGOs are inextricably interwoven with
the prerequisites of troubled societies that reflect the tangible implications
of this conflict, we can see how these NGOs impinge on the aspirations of each
side toward prosperous future at the grassroots, and contribute to fleshing out
the thoughts in real enterprises. Of course, this collision between the
services provided by these actors with the dire need of both societies for
changeable status quo, generates a new joint culture brings about convergence of views that these actors mainly work for.
What catches our interest to explore much more these
non-state actors in the mid of conflict in terms of where are they come from,
donors, their implicit agenda, what have been accomplished by whether at social
or political spheres, and are they feasible for conflict transformation or they
just merely an existing manifestations imposed by the nature of the conflict. Moreover,
the clashing orientations at both sides bring up more queries of how these
organizations handling them in order to guarantee the trust and endorsement of
the target groups.
In fact, German political foundations as international non-state
actors act unilaterally
and bilaterally at both sides, have a remarkable presence. These foundations are closely associated with
the major political parties at German parliament (Bundestag) are; Friedrich Ebert
Stiftung, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Heinrich Böll Stiftung,
Hanns Seidel Foundation and Friedrich Naumann Foundation for freedom.
The universal posture distinguishes them, their work is not only practiced within Israeli-Palestinian communities. So, this pushes us to wonder
how act these German conduits in a conflict zone. Considering the fields that these foundations work in, we can
fire a quick impression that they aim at developing both
conflicting societies through embedding the democratic values, creating an
environment where people can speak out highlighting certain issues, like conflict-induced dilemmas in the
Palestinian side, empowering women, rule of law, environmental issues,
reporting and censoring human rights abuse at both sides, enhancing conviviality
through joint initiatives that considered an obstacle encounters them, and
meeting the minimum needs of the Palestinian side toward an independent state
on the one hand, and ensuring that both sides could step up together towards a
promising future on the other hand.
It’s incontrovertible to ascribe their presence as somewhat
influential as the official diplomatic channels running multilaterally to reach
an end to this conflict culminated with the most recent Paris’s initiative for
a new series of negotiations, irrespective to what extent have these political
foundations topped the list of accomplishments in resolving this conflict.
This is what makes the conflict scene more embellished with
these conduits. Thus, the deteriorated situation isn’t left without remedies where
these aforementioned foundations acting tirelessly through organizing
symposiums where the cultural elite is engaged to discuss various issues even
the fateful ones, there are ongoing activities for youth
to embrace their ambitions and help them alleviate the negative effects of
challenges caused by conflict through conducting researches and analyzing the
status quo all the time. Furthermore, it’s an axiomatic reality that these
foundations play a good role in embracing the political orientations with new pillars
of leading the civil society, good governance, and political education
represents the broader scale of these foundations’ agenda. As well as, we can find out the
social mobility they contribute to. For instance, at the Palestinian side there
are some marginalized social issues being taken into consideration to reach the
revival, because the German policy in this area aims at erecting the pillars of
change by approaching the societies and meeting their needs.
To sum up, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a fertile
environment that provokes the engagement of the international non-state actors
within. The German presence through its noticeable political foundations add up
distinguishable traits to this conflict reflect the developmental process socially
and politically at the local level sponsored by these foundations.
The Germany political foundations constitute a reference and incubator for change and policy-makers at both sides rely on in many things through transferring
the German deep-seated experience of social and political transformation which
represent a role model for many people in this area to interact with.